[Nero Germanicus]

When Judge Lamberth dismissed the original Taitz Social Security number/Bounel lawsuit he wrote in his order:
“Ever persistent, plaintiff has once again come before this court in an effort to uncover “the biggest cover up in the history of the nation.” She believes that the President is using a “fraudulently obtained” social security number and that the Social Security Administration—among other agencies—is involved in a scheme to “cover [ ]up social security fraud, IRS fraud, elections fraud and possibly treason” committed by the President. As her numerous filings with the court demonstrate, plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy. Unfortunately for plaintiff, today is not her lucky day.”—Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth, US District Court for The District of Columbia, August 30, 2011
http://www.scribd.com/doc/63579610/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-33-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-Signed-by-Chief-Judge-Royce-C-Lamberth-gov-uscourts-dcd-146770-33-0

[American Constitutionalist]

" “the biggest cover up in the history of the nation.” She believes that the President is using a “fraudulently obtained” social security number and that the Social Security Administration—among other agencies—is involved in a scheme to “cover [ ]up social security fraud, IRS fraud, elections fraud and possibly treason” ...........

Read that carefully folks and let it sink in how ironic that statement is after all the breaking scandals and revelations in the past month and how much Lamberth spoke to soon in saying that.

IRS fraud ? how about what the nation as learned in the past month about the IRS ?

This time ? Orly's claims seems more relevant then ever now.

[SvenMagnussen]

Orly needs a rebuttal witness.

In her previous case, the SSA filed a response with the Court it had adequately searched and provided copies of all documents found except for the documents associated with a living person. Obama’s SSA documents are exempt under the Privacy Act from exposure. Any data found on Obama’s Form SS-5; such as the address of the applicant or the zip code of the applicant, are exempt from exposure because he is a living person.

Orly repeatedly asserts the number was originally assigned to Bounel and he is not alive because he was born over 120 years ago. Orly needs a witness to testify the number was originally assigned to Bounel and stay focused on Bounel. Any mention of Obama’s documents will lead to dismissal because of the Privacy Act.