They need to tell us exactly who are the elected and other officials who have seen their evidence. That is, they should name them.
It is only in this way that their constituents can confront them and demand a "yes" or "no" answer from them. For example, Zullo named Alan West, a former Congressman. He says West agreed 100% with The CCP's findings but categorically refused to publicly endorse them. It looks as though Rubio has seen the evidence.
For example, will any of the Sheriffs and police chiefs step forward after this convention at which Zullo has claimed triumph? Will the convention write it up in its report? One Kessler is no good at all. In fact, his babbling has a deleterious effect on the case.
I suspect that our elected and appointed officials are going to stonewall us, just as Michael Medved explained it to me on the air. That is, "We are not running against Obama. We must focus on '14, and then '16." The only way The CCP Is going to counteract that prevailing Establishment GOP game plan is to shame them out into the open. Name names. "Who saw what and when did they see it ... WTF aren't they doing anything about it?"
Everyone seems to know what we know ... the documents are fraudulent. That fact doesn't automatically lead to impeachment. So why the fear?
Joe, name names.
BTW, I not-so-charitably second your impression of Kessler. Comes across as a bit of a nutter.
“They need to tell us exactly who are the elected and other officials who have seen their evidence. That is, they should name them.”
Agreed. Make them act. If they don’t then release the evidence of this third citizenship. Those politicians that know and do nothing would then be complicit.