Replies

If Zullo’s evidence is rock solid, why IS he waiting? I have been foremost among those saying ‘give him time’. But that was based on the assumption he was still standing his evidence up. If the latter, he should keep his cards close to the vest until every ‘i’ is dotted & every ‘t’ is crossed.

But if the legwork is done & the evidence is ‘astonishingly persuasive’, then what DOES he gain by waiting?

If Zullo was to make the evidence to the public, Orly Taitz would add that to whatever lawsuit she has going on, and probably file 10 more. The media would present this evidence as something coming from Orly, and will present it to the public at the same time they show Orly saying something completely crazy. The public will not believe this evidence.

If the first time the public hears about this evidence is when the Congress starts an investigation, the public will believe that there must be at least some legitimacy to it, and will want to know the truth.

Zullo is doing the right thing. Unless people hear about this new evidence from a source that they consider 'legitimate', they will ignore it. And look at how well the media covered up their prior press conferences. The media would ignore Sheriff Joe presenting the evidence, and would show Orly screeching about throwing Obama in jail. The only way this can be presented to the public, since the media won't do it, in such a way as the public will consider it legitimate, is for Congress to take up the issue, and to tell the people, 'yes, there really is a there, there'.

The persistent noisy undercurrent we birthers create also adds to the mix in such a way that the ‘public’ will be eager to see what the most credible source, their elected representatives (what a joke on US), consider damning. That’s why devils like Soros go to such lengths to buy politicians ...

If he’s going to wait until after the recess, that will be September. If Amnesty has passed by then, the country will be kaput anyway.

At what point wd Taitz NOT hijack Zullo’s evidence?