“If proven that O does not have a United States Birth Certificate, as US Citizenship is required for the Pres. IMHO all appointments and laws signed (O-care) are sic INVALID.”
Wish that were true, but regardless of the circumstance of how the President Elect reaches the point where he is given the Oath of Office (swearing in), once he is sworn in he is the legal President. The only way to terminate prior to completing the 4 year term is by resigning, expiring or impeachment.
“”””...... but regardless of the circumstance of how the President Elect reaches the point where he is given the Oath of Office (swearing in), once he is sworn in he is the legal President. The only way to terminate prior to completing the 4 year term is by resigning, expiring or impeachment.......”””””
REALLY? Are you an attorney? Makes no sense to me. EXAMPLE.... Let us say a person does not have a medical degree but manages to take the Hippocratic Oath (swearing in) and opens a medical practice. In doing so, many people are fooled and even call him Doctor. Does his illigal usurption become moot? Answer Please
Not true X-spurt. We have had at least three Congressmen, all senators I believe, removed from office after it was discovered that they didn’t satisfy one of age or residency, or citizenship requirements. Their congressional histories were simply erased. Impeachment is irrelevant if the subject is not legally elected. The subject is an ordinary, in this case naturalized, citizen, with all the privileges and protections of a natural born citizen, except that he is ineligible for the presidency.,p> Obama has broken a number of laws, including fund solicitation as an ineligible candidate. There is lots to prosecute, but his powers and reshaping of government agencies will protect him. Beides Eric Holder, he has installed a Wahhabi Muslim as CIA director, and has dedicated operatives throughout the IRS, DHS, and as federal judges.
Too many have too much to lose by talking truthfully. Don’t you wonder why Mark Levine will simply not discuss the issue? He is a wealthy man, partly dependent upon party legal business, and dependent upon the FCC, and the IRS, to pay for the education of this two children. At least, while he promotes Rubio and Cruz, neither natural born citizens, has avoided any legal discussion, his shtick - no mention of John Marshall or Hamilton’s praise of Vattel to Washington, or Chief Justice Waite, who wrote Minor, or John Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment. Feet of clay. Read for yourselves, while we still have access to original documents, and most of the corrupted Supreme Court decisions have been restored by the Internet’s most referenced site for historical legal documents,Justia.com, the site whose CEO Tim Stanley is a Soros fellow at Center for American Progress, and whose confederate is Center for American Progess’s CIO, Eric Malamud. For these people the end justifies the means, and the Constitution is often an obstacle.
While I suspect both parties will refuse to address this, since they are both complicit, federal judges are political appointments and the Supreme Court has two Obama appointees who have already refused to recuse themselves, though they have personal and fiduciary interest in any eligibility decision. Nothing is likely to happen. We are a nation of just those laws convenient to the ruling czar. Article’s 1, 2, and 10 are under attack. But Obama swore to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. His oath was most reflective of Sharia law, where taqia to promulgate the Quran is not just permitted, but ordained.
Hope it isn’t 2 out of 3