[Jeff Winston]

I was a little surprised by what Zullo said - they used the 1960 manual. I should NOT have been surprised, LOL, because it does make sense. The manual in use at the time obama was born would indeed have been the 1960 - any changes to that one would have resulted in the one that I posted. Otherwise it (the 1961 dated manual) would not have been re-issued as a “revised”. I haven’t looked over the 1960 manual to compare between the two.

It would be nice if you could turn up a copy of the 1960 manual.

I'm betting it still doesn't say what they claimed the manual said.

[bluecat6]

What a tool.

See my other post.

The requirements were mostly identical year to year. Not until the 70s or 80s did things change much.

This is a crap argument.

[Ladysforest]

Oh, I don’t think there is a problem getting a 1960 manual. I think Dr. Conartist has one.

As to the one used in the long ago presser, well you can thank Dr. Corsi for that cluster. I spoke with Mike about that and a few other things, and I think it confirmed some of Mikes concerns re Dr. Corsi.

I don’t think they work together any more.

What most people are missing is that the manual is not of any value, not the federal one anyway. Not if you are talking about the codes penciled on the BC. Because those were done at the local level.

The feds could not have changed those or anything on the BC - they were working from rolls of microfilm. The fed manual tells them how to handle anomalies - particularly as they might arise coding the childs race. But no changes are made to the actual BC from the federal coders end of the process.