Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

It looks like the industry didn’t learn anything from all the years of NiCad thermal runaway issues.


11 posted on 05/29/2013 9:43:28 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: USNBandit

“It looks like the industry didn’t learn anything from all the years of NiCad thermal runaway issues.”

http://www.avweb.com/blogs/insider/AVwebInsider_DreamlinerFire_207979-1.html

“The Dreamliner’s Battery Fire”

I had a thermal run-away with a ni-cad installed in a Bell Jet Ranger. I made a night emergency landing in the bush in Uganda, spent the night while it cooled and managed to get it started in the morning. I made a safe 10 minute flight with the batt switched off to my base camp.

My problem was too infrequent deep cycling of the battery. Thankfully, that was something I could do in the bush with a bit of brass shear wire and a Honda 24v generator.

Aviation is always in search for a lighter way to store energy. Some older aircraft used a compressed air bottle. The Sikorsky CH-53 uses a hydraulic accumulator (Compressed nitrogen “spring”). I’m surprised that super-capacitors have not been used. I guess that the instant discharge if damaged in a crash is the problem.


15 posted on 05/29/2013 10:23:40 AM PDT by BwanaNdege ("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson