Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: deek69

This makes no sense. Who cares what Iowa thinks of a head to head when we are talking about a Party caucus.

I already dislike the fact that Iowa has much too great a roll in picking a candidate than it should. Based on the people who win the nominations, I think I would prefer the days of smoky backroom deal making and open conventions. It would make for better television anyway!


3 posted on 05/25/2013 11:36:04 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim from C-Town

I already dislike the fact that Iowa has much too great a roll in picking a candidate than it should.

Yep. That is BS. That’s why we have so much pork and 18billion uses for corn. No politician is going to tell Iowa we are not going to splurge on pork or corn.

We get to decide from their leftovers.


8 posted on 05/25/2013 11:47:43 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim from C-Town

There’s no good reason for Iowa’s disproportionate role in determining nominees. It’s insane that it still goes on unchallenged.


15 posted on 05/26/2013 12:41:26 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson