. . . . Check out # 68 , 69 , 70.
Thanks, Kenny Bunk.
Posted on 05/15/2013 3:59:44 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
43. Investigators requested an independent review of our findings in respect to the long-form birth certificate image that fell within his field of expertise.
44. Upon the conclusion of our expert’s examination he issued an independent 40 page forensic report in which he verified our investigational finding and validating conclusion in full agreement with the finds of investigators. He concluded:
• “…based on my observations and findings, it is clear that Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured documented created by utilizing material from various sources.” and
• “In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated.”
Authenticity of White House Released Birth Certificate Image
45. Investigators have determined beyond probable cause that the computer image released on April 27, 2011 by the White House, and purporting to be a true computer copy of Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate, is not a scan of an original hard copy document. It is, in fact, an undeniable computer generated forgery created with the sole intent to deceive the public by commission of felonious fraudulent acts.
46. Sheriff Arpaio’s investigators have determined the document ( the .pdf file released by the White House) was created entirely by human intervention, and not by the actions of random computerization. As such, the White house computer image cannot be relied upon as bona fide factual record of the birth event that it attempts to depict. [...]
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Happens to the best of us, sweetie. Don’t worry about it.
Here’s why such a hearing hasn’t taken place.
Letter from Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery to a concerned citizen, named Brian Reilly about why the prosecutor has not launched an investigation under Arizona Revised Statute, Chapter 23, Sec. 13-2311 which states in part, “…any person who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud or deceive, knowingly falsifies, conceals or covers up a material fact by trick, scheme or device or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing such writing or document contains any false fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry is guilty of a class 5 felony.”
Dear Mr. Reilly,
Thank you for taking the time to write and for the concerns you have expressed. There are a couple of points of analysis, though, in determining whether a criminal charge can be filed, regardless of the charge or who the suspect might be. The first is whether I have jurisdiction over the case. That requires that some conduct had to have occurred in Maricopa County for me to have jurisdiction. From the Sheriff’s Office investigation into suspect documents produced by the White House to date, that investigation has not revealed any evidence that conduct occurred in Maricopa County. I have discussed this with the Sheriff. As for any issues regarding qualifications or information provided regarding the Presidential Election itself, that is a statewide election. Under Arizona law, the Secretary of State and the Attorney General have jurisdiction over statewide elections. I do not.
I will share with you, as well, that the criminal statute you cited in your message requires additional evidence that the MCSO investigation to date has not uncovered. Specifically, we would need evidence to affirmatively prove that Mr. Obama is not a US citizen. To date, there has been evidence presented leading to speculation that documents have been forged and other documents do not exist. That alone, though, is not sufficient evidence to present to a grand jury and actually have a reasonable likelihood of conviction. I cannot speak for other prosecutors at the state level around the rest of the country or for prosecutors at the federal level but Arizona’s ethics rules do not permit prosecutors to file a charge they can only hope to be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt at a later stage.
I stand ready and willing, however, to review any case submitted for charges and, if the evidence is there, I will prosecute regardless of who the suspect/defendant may be.
Sincerely,
Bill Montgomery
Maricopa County Attorney
Per Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery on 9/22/12:
“To date there has been evidence presented leading to speculation that documents have been forged and other documents do not exist. That alone, though, is not sufficient evidence to present to a grand jury and actually have a reasonable likelihood of conviction.”
See this link for a source and date of the letter posted by NG:
That letter is out of date because it was BEFORE Arpaio and Zullo obtained the report from a court certified digital document expert confirming the forgery of the BC beyond any doubt.
Montgomery was exercising prosecutorial discretion in not going forward back in September 2012 and being GOP-e he could still be holding back using his discretion.
If Montgomery or another state AG or county AG has decided to turn this into a live criminal investigation, that could very well be confidential at this point.
As Arpaio and Zullo state in their affidavit in AL, they strongly advocate a congressional investigation of what they regard to be a certified fraudulent document.
Yup, building that case against Obama and his fake Obama birf certificates.
Well I guess we’ll all have to wait and see if the Cold Case Posse has gone back to Bill Montgomery, or gone to any other prosecutor with updated allegations of criminal behavior.
I agree with you that a Congressional committee should have long ago (before the election) held hearings and used Congresssional subpoena power to force release of the original birth record.
Lots of voices saying the same thing and getting their words from the same place = one stream media.
However, regretting, of course, your unfortunate unwanted mental image, I think that makes the "one stream" media moniker even more accurate!
No matter what they say, whatever they're spraying on us sure isn't rain! It smells more like what your dog is using to mark territory.
Hmmm...does that mean they're marking us with their one stream just like your dog marks that fire hydrant, because that might explain what the "mark of the beast" reference in Revelation means!
Well now that image is indelibly imprinted on my mind. ‘J.R.’ (my feisty little All-Male dog) will never again mark a fire hydrant without bringing to mind the One Stream Media. & as for a double entendre, it really is excellent. Nice work!
I.E., The man's performance has been so poor, that many more folks will look behind the scenes ... at the puppet masters ... to try and understand why. There may also be a problem familiar to anyone in PR. That is, if the client is dumb enough, he starts to believe the legend created for him.
Why isn't Zullo interviewed on Hannity?
Correct-a-mun-do. It's clear that The CCP has established a case for forgery. Whodunnit? Who in the official world of those who can legally use the evidence will do so?
All of a sudden it will be 2014 and the public at large will STILL have no idea WTF we are talking about. If we do not take the House and Senate, all of a sudden it will be 2016 and we shall have leapt 25 years down the road toward a complete Social Revolution.
. . . . Check out # 68 , 69 , 70.
Thanks, Kenny Bunk.
This is a civil case against the SOS, but that dosn’t meen splash damage from Beth Chapman being forced to do her job can't undermine Obama.
Hawaii DOH is not unified under Fuddy, there is a faction that still wishes to obey the law. If Beth Chapman is forced to investigate candidate eligibility in a step by step methodical way, at some point a whistle-blower may call time on the whole con game.
If sufficient political damage is done to Obama, and enough new scandal revealed, congress may impeach him itself if for no other reason than to save the Democrat congressmen, especially Senators, up for re-election in 2014 or 2016.
Hi, KB—thanks for the ping. I agree that Obama believes the hype. I still think his backers failed to grasp the full implications of Malignant Narcissism when they pushed him over the finish line. If/when they begin to agitate for better second term results, they’ll be in for a rude awakening.
Btw, I did read your post re: Obama’s passive aggression. Great job, KB! Obama is beyond all doubt a vicious passive aggressor. Recall the time he so casually tossed out, ‘Don’t get between Michelle & a tamale’. Michelle is v weight conscious, & is constantly trying to lose lbs. A snark like that from her husband wd be v wounding. But she can’t say a word because he wd adopt that smirky faux-innocent surprised look & say, ‘It was just a joke. Where’s your sense of humor?’.
Words fail me to describe how devastating it wd be to be married to this clod. Don’t anybody think Michelle is loving it for the perks. She wants/needs love just like any other wife. The only time—& I mean the ONLY time—she ever looked happy was during that brief stint when it was rumored that she & a member of her security team were having an affair. Her face & expression glowed & bloomed, and she exuded confidence & excitement. She even lost weight!
Something happened & l’affair ended, & she was back to her angry, resentful, unhappy self. That tells you all you need to know about what kind of a husband Obama is. [Well, that plus the Reggie Love, Donald Young, Larry Sinclair, etc., connections.] The kind, by Michelle’s own admission, who paws through her wardrobe. Now why wd he do that? (1) he’s a cross dresser [doubtful] (2) he was making ‘innocent’ comments about which dresses didn’t make Michelle look fat.
“a step by step methodical way”
It seems unlikely the Court would describe for her a step-by-step procedure to follow. More likely they would tell her that she must investigate and leave the methodology and what constitutes sufficient evidence up to her.
In that case, a verification from the Hawaii DOH would probably suffice, just as it did in Arizona and Kansas.
This is the most important civil case ever to be brought in the United States.
Either the Judges defend the US constitution or the Republic is finished.
If you believe that verification [it dosn’t even have Onaka’s primary stamp - just some underling puppet’s initialled stamp that Fuddy could control] I pity you.
What gets me is that the GOP-e thinks they will get to live out and complete full careers in peace. We are dealing with communists here NOT just some bunch of Labour party socialists.
These jellyfish will be tolerated as long as they are needed, then its “normalization” time.
I believe that you go a step too far in your legal thinking with that. All we (well I) want is for one black-robed SOB somewhere, one state AG, one Republican Governor to look at the evidence.
The above mentioned boolshiiter need not say, "Yup, it's a phony." All he needs to say is, "Hmm this court finds evidence leading to some doubt as to the authenticity of the documents. Mr. AG, ya shoulds taken him off the ballot until this issue was resolved. If these are indeed proven forgeries, we need to pursue this as a criminal matter."
Do not look for some magic all-purpose remedy ... right now we need acknowledgement that there IS a disease. No one with authority to do anything about it has publicly acknowledged the forgeries, or even simply done his job. Until that happens, we got nuthin'!
Thanks for the ping! I was waiting for that.
Today, Zullo and Gallups remarked that the Obots “have gone silent” after release of the AL affidavit indicating that they are experiencing extreme distress in rebutting it.
The Obot, SP and after-birther response to this affidavit has been pretty muted on FR, too, so far.
Zullo and Gallups also discuss how Orly Taitz has turned on Zullo and Arpaio exhibiting what Zullo calls PSY-OPS-type behavior against the solid criminal forgery case.
. . . . # 79.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.