It ought to be, sending Stevens into that part of the world was both foolish and cruel--or it was despicable...
This is a subtle yet key part of this propaganda operation.
By the mainstream news media keeping quiet about the Ambassodor being a sodomite, it allows for the conservative part of their machine (which is outside the mainstream), to scream about the fact. This makes the conservative internet media justified in having righteous indignation.
A key part of the tactic is to put conservatives on a “high horse” - with complete justification. The conservative pundits are, in fact, correct in pointing at the hypocrisy of the left and news media in that they are not “standing up” for the sodomite in this instance. If the left stands up for sodomy, to be consistent they’d have to stand up for it in every instance.
Once a pundit gets the conservative “righteous indignation” going, the typical conservative will jump in and lend positive support to the pundit.
And again, this is a powerful tool, because the righteous indignation is coming from a valid point. Ambassador Stevens was a sodomite and it is being swept under the rug; this isn’t some imagination or conjecture, it’s actually happening. This author, like others, is pointing out hypocrisy in the media; that part of the story is factual.
This sweeping under the rug is very important to Fox news, which tows the line on not condemning sodomy. If Fox pointed out that the Ambassador was a sodomite, the on air personalities would have to either condone or condemn it and would thus either offend the social conservatives in their audience or the powers that be (in that case likely resulting in legal action). Fox can avoid the whole thing by just not mentioning it. The rest of TV media, of course, does not want to highlight for their sodomite audience that dear leader and Hillobeans left a sodomite in the field to be brutally murdered; not exactly the PR the administration is looking for.
As to the question of why Ambassador Stevens would be sent there, he’s just a minion of interntional banking - a minion.
When the Soros NGOs send people into a middle eastern country I don’t think George loses much sleep over whether they live or die. When JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, etc., send people into dangerous countries to set up shop, I don’t think anyone think “oh my, this is too dangerous, we should not send people there”. On the contrary, history has shown that when minions perform in a stellar manner in dangerous situations, they are amply rewarded by their masters. Herbert Hoover found himself in the middle of Boxer Rebellion; many new world order figures did all sorts of dangerous missions in WWI and WWII as young men, then went on to rise up through the ranks of business/politics working for the same shadowy power interests.