Posted on 05/08/2013 5:41:10 AM PDT by johnatures
Media coverage of the South Carolina special election focused upon the candidates, Elizabeth Colbert-Busch and the winner, Mark Sanford. Yet the real winner could turn out to be somebody who isnt from South Carolina: Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul....
...Anyone who follows presidential politics knows that South Carolina is a key primary state. Ron Paul came up short both times, only getting one percent in the crowded primary captured eventually by Arizona Sen. John McCain with 33 percent in 2008. Four years later, Paul did much better, getting 13 percent of the votes. But Paul finished fourth of four candidates in 2012 in the Palmetto State, behind Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, and Rick Santorum.
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.yahoo.com ...
this is absurd. ron paul had zero to do with sanford’s win. hell, sanford didn’t have very much to do with his win. my 2 year old nephew would have run strong in SC-1 if he ran as a republican.
but then his opponent — I forget her name. the celebrity’s sister — hid under a rock for a month, refused to take media questions, and when she finally did, she refused to say whether she would vote to repeal ACA.
that’s why she got her tail kicked.
Sanford won because people hate obama's nightmare, his politics and his simpering tingle legged followers, such as Colbert-Busch's brother, more than they hate a weasel like him.
Rand Paul tarnished his reputation with any association with Sanford, a reputation now somewhat damaged by a perception he supports something/anything that might look like amnesty or reminds voters of his father.
I’m sure this result has ‘em soiling their skivvies down at the DNC. If a candidate THIS flawed can win by such a wide margin over a semi-celebrity who had every available bit of party support, it bodes ill for them in ‘14. Even the Todd Akin candidates may be beating Democrats in the midst of Obamacare imploding.
You're talking about a congressional district. Those tend to be shaped with particular partisan outcomes in mind, irrespective of candidate.
I wouldn't get too excited about the GOP holding a seat they've held for 30 years. In fact, Sanford held this seat himself a dozen years ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.