Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

What else does the Obamas know? Lawyering stuff? His short stint as a lawmaker?

Every situation he (and Jarret) faces, it always reverts back to his community-organize root.

1 posted on 04/30/2013 4:32:18 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sir Napsalot
Lawyering stuff?

Obama actually handled exactly one (yes, that's 1) case. Before that the case was completed, he was offered the choice of permanently leaving the Illinois Bar, with records sealed, or facing a disciplinary hearing. He chose to leave.

When his Bar Application was available on line, it was easier to see perhaps why. He denied ever having used another name (an "alias"). He neglected to mention drug use. (Reckon he neglected to read his "autobiography.")He neglected to mention traffic violations. There may be more to it, but the records are now sealed.

Oddly enough, his wife also is no longer a member of the Illinois Bar. Her case is crystal clear. She was ordered off the bar by the courts when a client committed insurance fraud. Oddly enough though, Michelle, however, actually would possibly have an opportunity to re-apply. This was also the first case she managed more or less on her own. She also had much more actual legal experience than Barack.

When it comes to the law, it appears TMJE, that both of the residents of the WH were, despite high class Ivy credentials,legal incompetents.

Bookmark this. You'll never see it in the MSM.

2 posted on 04/30/2013 5:30:40 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Obama Molecule: Teflon binds with Melanin = No Criminal Charges Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
Good article. Alinskyite tactics, if they were workable beyond a dysfunctional failed city like Chicago would be the only tactics ever used.

Same with the Cloward–Piven strategy to overload local welfare to force the federales to create a minimum annual wage. That strategy doesn't work simply because this is a very big country with an enormous number of 'locals' and welfare is paid by the federales anyway ~ has been since the 1930s under FDR (called FDIC for many years).

It is very misleading when advocates attempt to get Republicans to believe that Alinsky and Cloward-Plivan are the only source of rules governing Democrat political behavior.

Much more often their ambition is to win elections so they can run rampant naked through bushels of money!

Adding the doctrine of '47%' to the litany, an otherwise decent Republican candidate can manage to alienate just about everyone in the country ~ including his or her own mother, and probably his chillun'. Life, and economics, and government, are far more complex than a handful of slogans, aphorisms and attitudes.

3 posted on 04/30/2013 5:35:21 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson