Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/29/2013 11:10:02 AM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John Semmens

Without those devices, they would still be looking for the suspects, who would have carried out more bombings by now.


2 posted on 04/29/2013 11:11:36 AM PDT by Daveinyork (."Trusting government with power and money is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

For the non-satire version ... Bing (not google) ‘boston: death sentence for looking out window’ ...


3 posted on 04/29/2013 11:13:14 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

“unauthorized use of these devices”

Pardon???? GFY DHS.


4 posted on 04/29/2013 11:16:26 AM PDT by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Seemingly they should ban races, pressure cookers, sidewalks, and Islamic jihadists, as well.

(I know it is satire.)


5 posted on 04/29/2013 11:16:53 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Damn near had me this time....


7 posted on 04/29/2013 11:19:22 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Piffle....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Ha got me for a moment - didn’t read who posted it.


8 posted on 04/29/2013 11:31:55 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

They are actually debating a law in Texas today to penalize police if they try and stop someone from recording them.

Can you imagine the outcry from the MSM if police told them to stop filming something.


9 posted on 04/29/2013 11:39:17 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
BS, they tried to deliver at least two different sets of suspects before they were forced to implicate the moslems.

They are pissed, because they were forced to hang it on the actual perps. Look for Janet to seek a ban on public recording DHS Stormtroopers and police officials from AJ Holder.

10 posted on 04/29/2013 11:39:29 AM PDT by STD (One day closer to street justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

when Big Sis finds out what a cell phone is ,she’ll ban them altogether or just a shoot on site order


11 posted on 04/29/2013 11:41:53 AM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

...when they pry my Instamatic from my cold, dead hand...


13 posted on 04/29/2013 12:29:09 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

They’re kidding, right?

A thousand citizen cameras is better than one Homeland Security Division in public situations like the Boston Marathon.


14 posted on 04/29/2013 12:31:06 PM PDT by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Dangit, John.. I was all fired up and ready to go! Excellent!


16 posted on 04/29/2013 12:32:54 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

How dare you monitor the government?


17 posted on 04/29/2013 12:38:52 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
Secretary Janet Napolitano says DHS is “looking into the inherent threat posed by unauthorized use of these devices, especially in heavily trafficked public places. Law enforcement personnel at every level need to be on alert for people deploying these devices.”

I realize this is satire but we really shouldn't be giving the old girl (allegedly) any ideas!

18 posted on 04/29/2013 1:03:05 PM PDT by citizen (We get the government we choose. America either voted for Obama or handed it to him by not voting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
In all seriousness, the regime is probably hopping mad about having the pajamhadeen photos of al Harbi and his pals standing right next to the 2 Chechens. It really interferes with their “Lone Wolf” meme, and we wouldn't want to jeopardize the regime's pseudo-investigation.
21 posted on 04/29/2013 1:53:44 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

I immediately thought of this:

http://photographyisnotacrime.com/

DHS and other federal agents DO NOT want to be photographed, especially if what they are doing is not particularly authorized by the constitution, and in fact, is distinctly prohibited by the constitution.

This is not because such incriminating photographs, even of them committing blatant criminal acts, will ever result in them being prosecuted for those acts, especially with the current regime clinging to power; but it will be an unpleasant “public relations” gaffe that will make the official White House propagandist uncomfortable while denying it ever took place, and accusing those who mentioned it of being anti-American, in some bizarro world sort of way.

And, if you even think of ascribing *any* legitimacy to this at all, let me remind you that the *first* thing that is done in such terrorist attacks, as was done in Boston, is to shut down the cell phone towers in the area. So detonating any further bombs with cell phones is not a real problem.

What is, is using those cell phones other feature: photography. Which is *specifically* what they want to discourage.


22 posted on 04/29/2013 2:48:35 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson