Replies

Hey, nutjob. Why don't you post the REST of what I wrote in that EXACT SAME POST?

Or at least give some of the salient part of it, like this:

As for your two other quotes:

...“[I] find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen. . . . ” John A. Bingham

Once again, you do what birthers always do: Take evidence that SEEMS to support your case, and present it as "definitive."

Both quotes misrepresent what the people who said them understood natural born citizens to be.

...As for John Bingham, why don't you give his other quote:

“Who are natural-born citizens but those born within the Republic? Those born within the Republic, whether black or white, are citizens by birth — natural born citizens.”

So in the very post where you claim I "lied" by not giving the full quote, the reason I was presenting other things Bingham said was because YOU repeatedly leave out Bingham's OTHER words that I brought forward.

And in fact, in that very same post I actually quoted Bingham saying, "of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty."

So I really didn't even do what you accused me of doing, because I included virtually those exact same words from Bingham. Now if I had, it would've only been a slight omission, not a "lie." But I actually included a quote from Bingham virtually identical to that one IN THAT EXACT POST.

So THANKS for illustrating to everyone what a liar you are. You've made my case quite eloquently enough.