[2ndDivisionVet]

There’s more chance of it being fought on icebergs than being non-violent. Think about who we’re up against. The people who had no problem lighting Gov. Sarah Palin’s church on fire with women and children inside. People who have no problem with 50 million dead babies, including that abortion nightmare in Pennsylvania.. People who think the “Tea Baggers” ought to be rounded up and treated like European Jews under Hitler and Stalin. People who think that Pol Pot was onto something and Che Guevarra was a hero.

[LibWhacker]

All true, and most of which proves they are cowards. Remember how they reacted when Republicans swept them out of the House and Senate in '94? They reacted like cockroaches do when someone turns on the lights, scurrying this way and that: Some resigned, declaring it was all over, some changed parties. So I'm counting on a repeat of that when they see the writing on the wall (and a little prayer won't hurt!).

Don't want to see violence because, imo, we won't escape unscathed. We only have a sample size of one to go by, but if the first Civil War is any indication, when Americans take up arms against one another, it results in some of the nastiest, bloodiest, brutal fighting the world has ever seen. I'm scared of a repeat on a much larger scale. Too many young people have been fully brainwashed and converted to the other side and they're likely to make the Khmer Rouge look like amateurs. The baby boomers among them are cowards, but their young are capable of anything. imo