It is hard to believe but the judge might have actually responded to some part of the following from Taitz’s motion:
“On the issue of the most egregious crime in the history of this nation, usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal using forged and stolen I.D.s , the U.S. Department of Justice defrauded the U.S. Congress, this court and American people and went behind the back of the U.S. Congress in order to cover up Obama’s forged and stolen IDs. U.S. Department of Justice became criminally complicit in the Racketeering Scheme to cover up Obama’s forged IDs.
“IF THIS COURT GRANTS A MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY THE U.S. ATTORNEYS’OFFICE, THIS COURT WILL ABUSE ITS’ JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND WILL GRANT AMOTION BY AN ATTORNEY,( IN THIS CASE THE ATTORNEY IS THE DEPARTMENTOF JUSTICE), WHO DOES NOT REPRESENT ONE SINGLE PARTY IN THIS CASE. BY DOING SO THIS COURT WILL BECOME COMPLICIT IN THE RACKETEERING SCHEME TO COMMIT THE ELECTIONS FRAUD AND TO USURP THE U.S.PRESIDENCY WITH THE USE OF FORGED AND STOLEN IDs.”
On the issue of the most egregious crime in the history of this nation, usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal using forged and stolen I.D.s , the U.S. Department of Justice defrauded the U.S. Congress, this court and American people and went behind the back of the U.S. Congress in order to cover up Obama’s forged and stolen IDs. U.S. Department of Justice became criminally complicit in the Racketeering Scheme to cover up Obama’s forged IDs.
A judge will look at this.... but only for the exquisite legal pleasure of throwing it out with maximum prejudice. Sorry.