Posted on 04/16/2013 12:33:05 PM PDT by marcbold
Profane? Yes, murder usually is.
Why was she arrested? It sounds like she reacted the fully approved way, in this country, especially New York.
Sadly, this isn’t shocking. Its just more evidence of that university professors, who are supposed to be the most open to discourse and new ideas, absolutely freak out and respond violently to ideas that they oppose.
Someone who definitely needs electro shock treatment, preferably with old sparky.
So in other words she teaches people how to lie.
Hey libtards…
Subject: Reconcile Professor Nutjob’s reaction with your mantra asserting that “diversity is our strength”.
Begin.
Well the rite of abortion is the only mandatory ritual of the Liberal faith.
So to her mind, the right to murder children in utero is sacred. It is showing accurate pictures of it that is, to her mind, profaning her sacred rituals.
A homey kind of gal - probably does a lot of sewing, cooking, gardening, canning, housekeeping type stuff. No?
Just like with Dr. Kermit, they don't want to be shown the horror of their values. They embrace the culture of death but don't want to see it.
You silly goose...you should know that diversity is only what the libs THINK is diverse.
If your ideas are actually different from theirs, you’ll be called racist, a neanderthal, or even PROFANE!
Why just the other day I sat in the garage pondering all of the various projects around the house for the summer. My thoughts kept coming back to “If I only knew someone that has taken a course in media studies...”
There are a lot of things I don’t understand. For instance, this “professor” probably considers and unborn child just a blob of tissue. What is so profane and disturbing about a picture of a blob of tissue? Not sure why she’s so upset other than the damage it does to her position on abortion.
I wonder how long it’s been since her abortion.
” She is an adjunct instructor of media study.”
Academia speak for “baby sitter”.
So she is insulted because of the posters of aborted humans?
Well isnt it part of her vaulted “right” to “choose”? Why would she be upset at the image? She should be asking to have her photo taken with those “clumps of tissue” that arent even people, right?
I agree with the old gal. Drawing and quartering little boys and girls is as “profane” as it gets.
Imagine liberal thugs like this with greater power over freedom of speech and religion.
Why was she upset? They were displaying the kind of "art" she adored. Shouldn't she have loved the photographs? She's a big supporter of abortion, right? These dead babies are a mirror image of what she is. Why weren't they considered beautiful in her eyes? Didn't she like seeing her own minds reflection?
An "adjunct instructor" isn't the same thing as a "professor".
Incidentally, Sheik Obomba wasn't a professor either, though he likes to have people believe that he was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.