Posted on 04/16/2013 3:30:35 AM PDT by markomalley
So why not encourage sterilization among the sexually promiscuous? Then they can fornicate all they want and no one else has to pay for it, either in cash or by the taking of an innocent life.
You are more than welcome my FRiend! :)
Pro-abortion is one thing but anti-adoption? Why would anyone be anti-adoption? And does her opposition to such extend to gay and lesbian couples?
Some day God will hand her essay back to her; I doubt she will like the comments or her final grade.
She revels in killing early stage humans but is appalled by seeing them live to be adopted into loving homes. The mind boggles at such evil.
The baby slated for killing in the Roe v Wade case lived. The courts move slowly and the Supreme Court decision authorizing the baby’s execution came only after she was born and immediately put up for adoption: one that got away. When I last heard of this lucky survivor—about 10 years ago—she was herself the mother of a little girl. There are two people who would disagree with the cold, murderous author of this piece.
Unmitigated evil.
What we should encourage is repentance for promiscuity, atonement and healing.
They often center on the pain experienced by a woman who is separated for life from her child, and some adoptees' persistent feeling of "displacement" and their longing to find their genetic parents, especially their birthmother.
These are realities. They deserve some attention.
But murder cannot be "better." That is madness.
Supremacists ideology at play.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.