Suggested scenario:
A woman has her home broken into and she is raped.
She is then told by the government social workers that counseling is available.
She avails herself of the counseling.
Now, she can’t obtain a firearm to protect herself because of the psych counseling, even though she should be the one most in need of a firearm for self protection.
>>>Suggested scenario:
A woman has her home broken into and she is raped.
She is then told by the government social workers that counseling is available.
She avails herself of the counseling.
Now, she can’t obtain a firearm to protect herself because of the psych counseling, even though she should be the one most in need of a firearm for self protection<<<
Good example. To make it even better, the rapist is still at large and has threatened to come back and kill her.
An abusive ex-boyfriend or ex-husband works as well.
Also, if they are going to take away 2nd Amendment rights from citizens, simply because they are on anti-anxiety medication, I think we should ban all those who are currently on, or who have ever taken such meds for being elected officials, appointed government officials, law enforcement officers, judges, public school teachers, etc. or from having any government jobs whatsoever.
If taking anti-anxiety meds makes somone “crazy” enough to not be allowed legal access to guns, they certainly shouldn’t have access to our children, our government or our freedom.
Regardless of any laws, short of locking them up, we cannot prevent a determined nutcase from getting guns. We can prevent them from teaching our children and running our government, etc., though.