Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

Passive Defense only works for so long. Eventually if you want this to stop then companies and governments are going to go on the offensive. Either position has it’s advantages and disadvantages.

The second for me, seems to be the one more fraught with unintended consequences. Mainly for the Law-abiding user on ‘net’ services.


3 posted on 04/10/2013 4:31:35 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Working Man
That's thing.

So far these cyber attacks have not been officially recognized as ‘legitimate’ warfare. In the past it "hasn't hit" general public in their purse, in their welfare.

But I wholeheartedly agree with your “Passive Defense only works for so long.” statement.

6 posted on 04/10/2013 4:42:37 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The Working Man; Doug Loss
Doug is working on an idea of EMP/IP. That idea might work. We could take out the drones, being used, too.
8 posted on 04/10/2013 4:48:14 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson