Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp; Rides3

Rides3 is actually read the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act. At the time it was written both Alaska (Section 304) and Hawaii (Section 305) were territories.

The 1965 amendments to the 1952 act didn’t make any changes to the language of those sections.

http://library.uwb.edu/guides/usimmigration/66%20stat%20163.pdf


64 posted on 04/09/2013 8:30:54 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan; Rides3

Thanks for the link!

Where could we find the 1965 amendments?


65 posted on 04/09/2013 9:12:12 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: 4Zoltan; Rides3; WildHighlander57

Hawaii births were “subject to the jurisdiction” under the 14A to the same extent as in any other state in 1961. There was NO distinction for HI or AK births.

Statutes cannot change the constitution. Statutes can change naturalization of Indians and natives but not the birth status of 14A constitutional citizens, such as Barry claims to be in in HI in 1961.


69 posted on 04/09/2013 11:11:03 PM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson