VERY INTERESTING ..... many thanks for finding this, Rides3!
CCPS, lucy, ray, seize: pinging all y’all to this post!
To: butterdezillion
Why would Obama et al forge a birth certificate from Hawaii? Quite simple. Alaska and Hawaii are the only two states that do not have the “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement for birthright citizenship.
Continental U.S.: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401 Alaska: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1404 Hawaii: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1405
54 posted on Tue Apr 09 2013 14:42:50 GMT-0500 (CDT) by Rides3 [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Very interesting indeed.
“Alaska and Hawaii are the only two states that do not have the “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement for birthright citizenship.”
I do not see any support for this contention at the Cornell links.
“Subject to the jurisdiction” is in the 14th Amendment and I see no exception for Alaska and HI other than for certain Indians and natives. Those exceptions went away in 1900 in HI and in 1924 in AK. So there is no relation to Barry’s 1961 birth alleged to have been in HI.
Given all of the contemporaneous 1961 cross-corroborated documentation pointing to Hawaii as the residence of Stanley Ann in 1961 up to at least Feb.2, that seems to me to be why the birth was registered there (wherever it actually took place).