You keep stating your personal opinion as if it is fact. It’s the mirror opposite. I pointed this out to you in several posts, & you refused even to read them. [Or else you managed to read them w’out figuring out the meaning of a single word. I.e.: you blocked them out.]
Do some research of your own. You will be surprised & I daresay shocked [unless you are just fundamentally dishonest/a troll] at how many people To This Day doubt or flat out disbelieve Obama’s several/slippery/slithery nativity tales. The percentage is quite high.
Unless you are happy living in a fact-free make-believe universe, a bit of education on the subject can only do you good. It will save you the embarrassment of posting ignorant opinions that are contradicted by all available evidence/facts.
I don't share your belief. I believe that such an issue might have hurt Obama if there had been substantial believable evidence that he was born in another country. But, there wasn't. And, to this day, there just isn't.
Twice now the voters and their electors have decided that Obama meets the constitutional qualifications to be president. They won't be asked again. It's over.
I really think you ought to at least think about the question that I asked you in post 169. Obama won by a four percentage point margin last November. Your suggestion that he won by four points in spite of being politically hurt by the birther issue implies that Obama would have won by an even larger margin had there been no birther issue. Do you really believe that?
I don't.
Politically (if not financially) birtherism is dead. It died last November when the voters and their electors made their final decisions. People who want Obama to be removed from office early should shift their forcus to a demand for impeachment. I could join you in that kind of effort. ;-)