Claims regarding administrative discrepancies in the pdf LFBC based on different manuals and procedures that may or may not have been used by HDOH in 1961 are in a separate category of evidence from verified proof of digital manipulation in the pdf file itself.
As Zullo points on in the interview this week, a disinformation campaign is being mounted by Obots to claim that if a few minor investigative errors can be found (such as the meaning of ‘9’ or what Bennett wrote about numbering) then the entire Posse investigation and verification of forgery can be disregarded as a “fraud.” This claim that invalidation of a nit invalidates the whole investigation is obviously false.
“a few minor investigative errors”
He uses the Bennett article to corroborate what Verna Lee supposedly told Dr. Corsi about how BCs were numbered. This was false. Did he even read the article? Kind of sloppy for an investigator to say a document backs up his theory when in fact it doesn’t. And we still have not heard that tape of the conversatin with Ms. Lee.
So until the lab report declaring the BC to be a forgery is released, I’ll remain skeptical. How do we know he even read it?