Replies

Did you even read the article?

Why aren’t you the least bit interested in the fraud here?

I could understand if someone rolled their eyes about “some technicality” (not my opinion) like in John McCain’s case but this goes way beyond a technicality.

If Obama was born in Hawaii and had a valid birth certificate, all indications are that SCOTUS doesn’t give a rip about his foreign father. BUT THE STORY DOESN”T END THERE.

Obama doesn’t have ANY papers documenting ANYTHING about him.

That’s the point. He’s producing fraudulent documents.

John McCain didn’t do that.
Romney didn’t do that.
Cruz wouldn’t do that
Rubio wouldn’t do that.
Jindal wouldn’t do that.

Can’t you understand that that is a MAJOR STEP UP from a “technicality?”
It’s “enenmy combatant” territory.
It’s treason territory.
It’s coup territory.
It’s criminal conspiracy territory.
It’s fraud and forgery territory.
It’s election fraud, mail fraud, money laundering territory.

The article points out that Stanley Ann was messing with the US Consulate in Jakarta. How did she get Obama in and out of places without a US Passport. He wasn’t on her passport so how did he travel. And most likely (if I understand correctly) was NEVER on her passport since she needed a US birth certificate to put him on it.