Look at the three verifications
http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/kansas-verification.pdf
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/Obama-Verification.pdf
The stamp “Alvin T. Onaka” lines up perfectly along the left margin on all three verifications. Pure chance?
The Kansas verification was sent to SoS Kobash by Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine, the Arizona verification was discussed by Joshua Wisch, special assistant to Hawaii Attorney General David Louie in an e-mail to the Associated Press.
Are you saying that Dr. Onaka is not aware of the verifications?
Why are their different initials beside Onaka’s stamp on the Kansas verification and the Arizona verification?
“Are you saying that Dr. Onaka is not aware of the verifications?”
If you were a state official and the AG of another state asked you to verify whether Barry’s claimed BC was legit, would you regard the matter as significant enough to warrant your personal verifiable signature and not a signature stamp accompanied by unverifiable initials?
Have you ever seen a case where a person denied that initials were theirs and a handwriting expert authenticated the initials? In my experience a full signature is present on at least one page of a legal document when initials are used on other pages.
Use of a stamp and initials obviously provides a legal escape hatch of “plausible deniability” and a delaying opportunity in the event of any forensic challenge to the verification. Onaka can say “I didn’t use my stamp or authorize use of my stamp and those are not my initials.” How can it be proved that he is lying when his actual verifiable signature is not on the document?