Replies

In the author’s own words, ““It is hard enough to understand...The idea that it has lasted for 65 million years simply boggles the mind”, it is stated the author is ignorant enough to boggle the author’s mind trying to understand how it could be possible for the biological cells to remain undestroyed for 65 million years. Since the topic related to a scientific subject, it can hardly be honestly denied the author claims to be ignorant of the science to the point of having the author’s mind boggled.

If the author would care to present some observable evidence to demonstrate why proteins and other biological matter cannot ever be preserved in a geological formation for 65 million years, then we could perhaps have an informed discussion of the relevance of the fossils in the mentioned formation rather than an uniformed discussion based upon self professed ignorance and lack of understanding of the scientific principles under discussion.