Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GregNH
"the Constitution MUST be interpreted in such a way that every word in relevant.

The idea that ‘citizen at birth’ equates to ‘natural born citizen’ ignores the word ‘natural’.

If the intention was otherwise, they would have simply said a ‘born citizen’, or a ‘citizen at birth’ or ‘born a citizen’.

So it is clear they intended something else. So - what does the word ‘natural’ mean in the context of ‘natural born citizen’? There are two types of law. There is ‘positive law’ - this is man-made law, such as the Constitution, laws from Congress, state law, local ordinances, and so on. And then there is ‘natural law’ - this is the law of nature, or the divine."

Indeed. Simple logic dictates this.

And, speaking of natural law: Our Declaring Independence, and the founding document itself is based upon natural law principles.

99 posted on 04/02/2013 2:29:01 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid
Simple logic dictates this. Naturally!
101 posted on 04/02/2013 2:31:52 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson