Sure, they dress it up in a bunch of legal jargon, but most of their decisions are based on what the herd thinks, not on efforts to understand original intent.
Why you think that anything can be learned from herd mentality and group think, I do not know. From my perspective it is pointless to look for a deeper meaning in the commentary of this fraternity. There is no truth or insight to be found there, merely mindless repetition.
I’m not among those who have chosen to file 207 civil suits and rely on the American judiciary. Your question and statements are best addressed to those in the Obama is ineligible movement who have relied solely upon that vehicle for redress of grievances.
Since they file the suits, I read the decisions.