Judges have consistently applied US v. Wong Kim Ark to Obama’s eligibility and their rulings have not been overturned by higher courts. No court has ever ruled that US v. Wong Kim Ark does not apply to Obama.
For example: Ankeny v Daniels, Indiana A three judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled unanimously: “Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the United States are ‘natural born citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, November 12, 2009
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf
And:
Voeltz v Obama, Judge John C. Cooper, Leon County, Florida Circuit Court Judge: “In addition, to the extent that the complaint alleges that President Obama is not a “natural born citizen” even though born in the United States, the Court is in agreement with other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—September 6, 2012
http://judicial.clerk.leon.fl.us/image_orders.asp?caseid=77182640&jiscaseid=&defseq=&chargeseq=&dktid=57485906&dktsource=CRTV
And:
Tisdale v Obama, US District Court Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”— Tisdale v Obama, US District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, January 23, 2012.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82011399/Tisdale-v-Obama-EDVA-3-12-cv-00036-Doc-2-ORDER-23-Jan-2012
If you look at the court system since the nation was founded, you will notice that the most cockamamie decisions are subsequent to Roosevelt's appointments. One of the most insane rulings by the Supreme court, Wickard v Fullburn (A farmer can't grow his own wheat to feed his own cows) was entirely decided by Roosevelt appointed Judges.
Prayer in Schools? Something which had been going on since BEFORE the nation was founded? According to the Roosevelt/Truman judges, it was a violation of the 14th amendment!
Loons, all.
When have the merits actually been heard in a higher court? Cite the case in which it was submitted that Wong Kim Ark doesn't apply to Obama because his father was never permanently domiciled in the U.S.