Anyone can check for themselves and clearly read the “Natural Born Citizen” section of the “OPINION FOR PUBLICATION” by the Indiana Court of Aopeals .
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf
Obviously Judge Mahili, in his “trial on the merits” in Georgia thought he was citing an opinion: “For the purposes of this analysis, the Court considered that Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Ankeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly, President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary under O.C.G.A. under Section 21-2-5(b). February 3, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/80424508/Swensson-Powell-Farrar-Welden-vs-Obama-Judge-Michael-Malihi-s-Final-Order-Georgia-Ballot-Access-Challenge-2-3-12
Same with Judge John Cooper in Florida: “Voeltz v Obama” Leon County, Florida Circuit Court Judge: “In addition, to the extent that the complaint alleges that President Obama is not a “natural born citizen” even though born in the United States, the Court is in agreement with other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purpose, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—September 6, 2012
http://judicial.clerk.leon.fl.us/image_orders.asp?caseid=77182640&jiscaseid=&defseq=&chargeseq=&dktid=57485906&dktsource=CRTV
Yes, they can. Nowhere does it declare Obama to be a natural-born citizen. They had no proof of where he was born. And of course, we still don't. And second, they admitted that there was no actual precedent to support the phantom guidance they claimed to have divined from Wong Kim Ark, which never says anything remotely close to what they claim. Ark cited Minor's definiton of NBC. So, yes, please read the Ankeny decision.
Obviously Judge Mahili, in his “trial on the merits” in Georgia thought he was citing an opinion: “For the purposes of this analysis, the Court considered that Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Ankeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly, President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary under O.C.G.A. under Section 21-2-5(b).
Again, all this shows is abject ignornance on the part of an administrative judge. There was no legal proof Obama was born in the United States. And the Ankeny decision admitted it had no legal precedent to support the idea that Obama or anybody would be a natural-born citizen just by being a citizen at birth. As it turns out, Obama doesn't even meet Wong Kim Arks'requirement for satisfying the subject clause of the 14th amendment.
“In addition, to the extent that the complaint alleges that President Obama is not a “natural born citizen” even though born in the United States, the Court is in agreement with other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purpose, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—September 6, 2012
I've shown where the Supreme Court has said this is not the case. Again, this ignorance. There's not even a specific citation.
So the Florida court/judge agrees that the two sons of the Muslim president of Egypt who were born in the USA are ‘natural born citizens’ of the USA and eligible for POTUSA. Many Muslims are anxious to be a part of such a transformation. I don’t believe the Founders who as far as I know had no empathy with/for the Arab nations would be astounded at such a turn of events.