I know of no one who disagrees that naturalized citizens are not eligible for the presidency.
If you are born in the US, where your parents were born is irrelevant to your status as a “Citizen of the United States at Birth,” (as long as your parents don’t have diplomatic immunity or aren’t members of a foreign invading military). There is not a single Justice (based on their rulings in previous cases) on the Roberts Court who believes that two citizen parents are required in order to be a natural born citizen, if you have “jus soli” status.
Tisdale v Obama, US District Court Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”— Tisdale v Obama, US District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, January 23, 2012.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82011399/Tisdale-v-Obama-EDVA-3-12-cv-00036-Doc-2-ORDER-23-Jan-2012
And in a lawsuit that went to the Supreme Court of the United States and was denied a Writ of Certiorari: Swensson, Powell, Farrar and Welden v Obama, Administrative Law Judge Michael Mahili, State of Georgia Administrative Hearings: “For the purposes of this analysis, the Court considered that Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Ankeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly, President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary under O.C.G.A. under Section 21-2-5(b). February 3, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/80424508/Swensson-Powell-Farrar-Welden-vs-Obama-Judge-Michael-Malihi-s-Final-Order-Georgia-Ballot-Access-Challenge-2-3-12
Ten state or federal courts have ruled that Obama is indeed a natural born citizen with only one US citizen parent. No court has ever ruled otherwise.
“Ten state or federal courts have ruled that Obama is indeed a natural born citizen with only one US citizen parent.” Um, dismissing a case is not the same as ruling little barry bastard boy degenerate is a natural born citizen.
Depends on the parents' citizenship or domicile status when one is born. In 48 states, one still must meet the "subject to the jurisdiction" requirement as defined by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Trumbull in the Congressional Record: "The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."
Citing flawed decisions proves nothing except ignorance or corruption on the part of the erroneously opining judges.
edge919 is correct in citing Luria v. United States as to Constitutional presidential eligibility in post 467. That sets a precedent that trumps any lower court ruling.