[Seven_0]

And in the press conference where they announced this, they showed the public images that turned out not to be AT ALL from the manual they claimed they had, but were from one manual dated 1968 and another manual dated 1969.

Then, when the real manual turned up (found by a FReeper), it directly contradicted what they claimed it said.

From your link in post #150, the sheriff's copy has much greater clarity than the 1968 manual. If one is a copy of the other, then the sheriff's copy is the original.

[Jeff Winston]

From your link in post #150, the sheriff's copy has much greater clarity than the 1968 manual. If one is a copy of the other, then the sheriff's copy is the original.

I went back and looked at the page, and did a couple of screen captures.

I also went and looked at the original sources (both the Arpaio Posse's official video, and the 1968 manual on the site of the National Bureau of Economic Research). And the site does show correct images.

Here's the image from the Arpaio Posse's official video:

And here's the image from the original 1968 manual hosted at the NBER:

I can see where it would be easy to get confused from that graphic, but it is in fact the document on the National Bureau of Economic Research site that is clearer and more detailed, and it does appear to be the original.