Find the manual the list ‘African’ as a race and there may be something of a discussion.
The primary purpose of the information on birth certificates was for statistical collection. Hence why most states LFBCs look amazingly alike. It is also why there are hand written numbers in the fields of most LFBCs from most states from the period. These were keypunched onto IBM punch cards for statistical collection. Clerks could not make up things for the fields. Only the codified could be used.
The article is another hit job by a proven fraud.
The statistics were collected over time and the fields were the same for long periods. African was never a codified race in the statistics during the period.
The 9’s of the fake LFBC are very telling. They tell us no father was really listed if those marks are correct. The 9’s are a serious, serious problem. They prove fraud by themselves.
Well, the article gives links to the evidence. You can see the original sources for the 1968 and 1969 documents. There's really no denying that the Posse showed everybody stuff from 1968 and 1969 claiming it was from 1961.
There's really no denying that they claimed to have a very specific manual from 1961. There's no denying what they claimed it said.
And there's no denying that the real 1961 manual, found by a FReeper, absolutely contradicts what they claimed it said.
I don't know what you'd call that. I'd call it getting caught in a lie.