Can you synposize your objections to the Sheriffs findings, please.
Also, What is your response to butterdezillion’s painstaking research
Example:
the b.c. numbering discrepancies
“Synposize” should be “synopsize”
><
Ping to post #139
I haven't followed butterdezillion's stuff lately. There was a time when I did. So I can't speak on anything she's said that's terribly recent, but during the time I followed her stuff, I never saw anything that indicated any real fraud.
I haven't seen anything from anybody else that did, either.
With one exception: Fraud on the part of the Cold Case Posse.
Here's one of the better pages out there that talks about that fraud.
In a nutshell, they very clearly claimed they had a 1961 manual that said something very specific. And that specific thing was supposedly proof that Obama's birth certificate was a fake.
And in the press conference where they announced this, they showed the public images that turned out not to be AT ALL from the manual they claimed they had, but were from one manual dated 1968 and another manual dated 1969.
Then, when the real manual turned up (found by a FReeper), it directly contradicted what they claimed it said.
I forgot to give you the link: