Isn't that bizarre!!!
If that's the case then why sign it at all or put any name on it. If she is handing it to Sybrina then clearly Sybrina knows who wrote it. So what's the purpose in not signing it or signing it with a pseudonym???
The purpose in having the multiple hands involved here is plausible deniability regarding just who would be held responsible for this forgery: the person who wrote it or the person who dated it or the person who signed it or the person who presented it to the court or the person who claimed in his pleading that it was given to Sybrina prior to the Crump interview or the person who it is not addressed to.
Everyone played their part in crafting it. It's community property.
Having read many of the comments on the Diwata site, I would like to add these:
1]This DeeDee letter is being released by Bernie to try to put a dagger in the Two DeeDee Theory that alleges that there was one DeeDee for the March 19 Crump interview and a different DeeDee for the April 2nd Bernie interview.
2]The handwriting of this letter will match Witness 8’s handwriting. Bernie would not have released if it didn’t, afterall the purpose was/is to have something of Witness 8’s that puts her there at the March 19 interview and this at face value does it.
3]If this letter is accepted at face value, then the DeeDee at the April 2 interview was the DeeDee at the March 19 interview and the Two DeeDee Theory is dead.
4]That’s why Bernie presented the letter to the court — to try to kill the Two DeeDee Theory. It serves no other purpose for him.
5]He didn’t release it because he just got a conscience about withholding evidence and wanted to clear his files.
6]He didn’t release it because he wanted to show that DeeDee was so afraid of being ridiculed that she resorted to using pseudonym as he claims. The pseudonym on the letter is not there to protect her from blogoshpere attacks but to shield her from charges of forgery and/or perjury regarding the letter when it is ever presented in court. After all it’s not her name on the bottom of it. It’s the pseudonym saying all that stuff in the letter. They are pseudowords from a pseudonym.
7]Several things on the letter indicate that the writer was copying it under duress or pressure of some sort and deliberately making mistakes out of her displeasure of having to do so — the most obvious being the misspelling [Trevon] of a name [Trayvon] that she should have known by heart.
8]And then at some later time she is told to predate it for “March 19, 2012” and sign it and does so in a way that makes the letter appear strange so no one will take it seriously — especially the “Thank You” also an add on.
9]And if you are being compelled to copy stuff that you know is not true, then when you are told to sign something that you know is not true, what is better than a pseudonym.
10]Bernie and Crump are trying to pull off a conjob with this DeeDee Letter that is screaming from the housetops: Don’t Believe Me.