Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler

Why would there be any legal privilege here at all for Crump? He is not DeeDee’s attorney, and his clients, Trayvon Martin’s parents, are not facing any charges, nor will they. DeeDee is a witness whose credibility is at issue.

Work privilege my eye. Since when is suborning perjury privileged?


25 posted on 03/23/2013 10:35:13 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: heartwood
-- Why would there be any legal privilege here at all for Crump? --

Judge Nelson's rationale is that Crump is and will be opposing Zimmerman in legal actions. That makes him opposing counsel. Crump has stated that his intention is to sue Zimmerman. He could do that today, if he wanted to.

32 posted on 03/23/2013 12:01:26 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: heartwood
Why would there be any legal privilege here at all for Crump?

You are arguing law. This is beyond law. This is politics.

38 posted on 03/23/2013 12:51:52 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson