[Amendment10]

You sound more like the liberal arguing that a fetus does not deserve the legal status of ‘person’ accorded to all other human beings.

Noting that I have referenced evidence that corrupt, 10A-ignoring justices unconstitutionally legalized abortion in Roe v. Wade imo, I am skeptical of the approach that Sen. Paul is taking to resolve the issue, arguably a PC approach that appeals to conservatives.

Again, noting that I agree that life begins at conception, the post Civil War 14A was concerned primarily with protecting freed slaves, not addressing when life begins. And I think that past injustices concerning so-called abortion rights need to be resolved so that Constitution-ignorant patriots wise up to ongoing Supreme Court corruption.

[TigersEye]

I fully noted all of those points you had previously made and took them into consideration. I hope you will note that I was not responding in a pejorative sense but in the same vein you were, ie as a subjective description of your position as I see it.

Let me also note that the 14th Amendment was concerned with defining citizenship only not life or its Constitutional protections.

Whatever other conservatives think of the LACA, it appeals to me because I see it as the direct approach following the intent of the founding governing principles in the straightest possible line.