To: marktwain; ApplegateRanch
Except for a glimmer of sense in Lopez, the current rulings amount to saying that *everything* affects interstate commerce. Therefore the commerce clause is null and void, because if *everything* is included in the the clause, then there was no reason for the clause at all. Current commerce clause rulings essentially say "ignore all other sections of this document" it seems to me.
9 posted on
03/18/2013 12:10:19 PM PDT by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: ApplegateRanch; MileHi; marktwain; Jacquerie
I think this is an opportunity to revisit Wickard and the absurdity born of it. Why have a CC if the federal (remember we don’t have a national government) government has unlimited powers to regulate every aspect of human life?
The important wedge here is that a sovereign state is acting and not just some lowly human. This will be a very important ruling.
17 posted on
03/19/2013 5:08:09 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson