Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe; stormer
Hey do you think you can find even one scientist who explains how soft tissue could possibly last scores of millions of years?

Sure, how about the woman who first discovered it: "Schweitzer offers hypotheses for how the tissue could have survived so long. One is that the densely mineralized bone, combined with as-yet-undiscovered geological or environmental processes, protected the structures within." The "soft tissue" found was enclosed within mineralized bone, remember, and in only tiny fragments. But the real answer is "we don't know yet"--nobody's pretending it wasn't a surprise. But I know creationists are uncomfortable with the answer "we don't know yet."

Even one single experiment?

Like what? Are you expecting scientists to try to preserve soft tissue for millions of years just to prove to you it's possible? Will you be around when they do?

Any shred of scientific evidence?

Uh, yeah: THE SOFT TISSUE THAT'S BEEN FOUND IN 65 MILLION YEAR OLD DINOSAUR BONES. That's the evidence.

Now, a question for you: how old do you think the dinosaur bones are? I notice you haven't answered stormer's question about how you know soft tissues can't last millions of years, but maybe mine is easier.

92 posted on 03/18/2013 3:21:29 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
Ah, but she doesn't explain HOW! She doesn't offer up ANY evidence to support the hypothesis.

At least you can admit YOU DON'T KNOW. That's the most intelligent statement you have made.

THE SOFT TISSUE THAT'S BEEN FOUND IN 65 MILLION YEAR OLD DINOSAUR BONES. That's the evidence.

And you people wonder why everyone says that you Darwinists use circular logic. That's circular logic, pal, and if you can see that, then you are even stupider than I thought.

I didn't answer his question because he couldn't answer mine. From the same article you just posted: "After all, according to scientific estimates, T. rex fossils are 65 million years old. Soft tissue and amino acids should last only a fraction of that time."

In short you think its impossible that the scientists who date fossils could possibly be wrong, but you have no problem saying that the scientists who say soft tissue couldn't last millions of years are wrong. Why? Because one of these claims gores your SACRED COW. You are not interested in science, you are interested in forcing your ideology on others with the power of the government in league with homo fags like Zach Kopplin.

93 posted on 03/18/2013 3:50:27 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson