From Ashley Judd campaign ad (or is that Mitch's ad?)
Posted on 03/10/2013 1:17:52 PM PDT by John Semmens
Hollywood cutie Ashley Judd is preparing to run for the Kentucky senate seat currently held by Mitch McConnell (R). The 44 year-old actress has no prior political experience, but exudes confidence she’ll win.
“I’m pretty sure I’ll have the edge in the swimsuit and evening gown portions of the competition,” Judd bragged. “Talent-wise, I’m prepping by taking singing lessons from my Mom. The one iffy part I’m facing is the ‘poise question.’ There are so many worthy causes I’d like to promote during my reign that it”ll be hard to pick one.”
Judd speculated that “McConnell’s ugliness is a definite plus for me. He’s old and kind of lumpy with no sex appeal. While I may be a bit past my prime for Hollywood at 44, McConnell’s way past his ‘sell by’ date.”
Whether Judd’s glamor and sex-appeal will be able to overcome the ill-will sparked her previous campaign to replace coal-fired power-generation with the free distribution of government-subsidized D-cell batteries remains to be seen. Coal mining is a major industry in Kentucky.
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
http://azconservative.org/2013/03/09/mccain-calls-fellow-senators-wacko-birds/
This is why women should not vote. Period.
She’s the last person that should comment on someone’s appearance. Seriously, I saw a pic of how she looks w/out a professional makeover. Not someone who should throw stones.
From Ashley Judd campaign ad (or is that Mitch's ad?)
I’m pretty sure this is satire, as advertised...
Although this kind of talk comes naturally to leftists, I do not think it will go over well with the avergage voter.
We've all known this kind of vile cur at one time or other
Got me again.
I think Ashley could win in California or Massachusetts.
Kentucky will be a real tough one.
She’ll have a huge $$ advantage over most any Dem primary opponent, but not sure she’ll even get to November.
Son, that is the "semi-satire" part of the thing. She didn't actually say it. Now you know why some people really hate this made-up stuff.
I’d sort of like ole Mitch to plaster scenes of her nude scenes all over the place.
I’d sort of like ole Mitch to plaster scenes of her nude scenes all over the place.
That's a nice touch!
She looks pretty good in a soaking wet sundress on a Memorial Day afternoon in Indianapolis. Other than that.....
I saw her without make-up on a set 3 years ago here in Hollywood as I work in the biz. She looks worse than a washed-up porn actress. One of my best friends who is a make-up artist for countless TV shows told me in their position, they enjoy touching up the really natural beautiful people as it takes less time.
The ugly ones (Madonna, Clooney, Matt Damon etc—typical libs) are the worst to work with as they have ugly mugs. Don;t believe those mag cover pages, they are just graphic artist fixed..
digitally enhanced
LOL
Distinguishing between news and satire is becoming increasingly difficult... this one was waaaaaay too believable.
Well after Franken won in Minnehaha, there’s no liberal too whacky to count out.
pretty sure she's got the topless competition locked up...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.