New world order (wall street, the foundation system, etc.) has enough of its minions in the top echelons of both ideologies/political parties, “right”/Republican and “left”/Democrat that they effectively control both. Whichever one is in office, the other beats up on them; this is nwo’s simple strategy of always having framed all sides of an argument, which keeps the people arguing completely oblivious to them. Libertarianism and other third parties, unfortunately, are riddled with the same problem.
NWO is heading in the statist direction, so its primary direction is to the left. When Democrats are in power, they therefore take two governmental steps forward in the direction they want to go, when Republicans are in power, they take a step back control-wise, and work on giving their various monopolies more legal latitude and getting as much funding as possible for government military technology initiatives, which profits many companies in their orbit.
At this point, Democrats/the left are therefore mostly quiet on military, CIA, foreign intervention, etc., except the “far left” always protests these things, as that is part of their core ideology/brand.
Libertarians have always been critical of overreach in these areas; that’s a commonality between them and the far left, though the underlying direction they are going is the opposite of the left (the left seeks statism but Libertarians seek minimalist government and individualism).
The common ground of these two movements, however, is helpful to nwo in various ways:
a) makes anyone on the political right suspicious of Libertarians since they appear to be siding with the left; it’s very difficult for Libertarians to gain a lot of traction with the right
b) makes conservatives skeptical of new world order “conspiracy theory” because of “who” is asserting that perhaps strong counterintelligence and clandestine operations may not always be in the best interest of the nation; this serves to enable NWO to hide in plain sight, since a key assertion about NWO is that they have always had undue influence at the State Department and CIA
c) can be used to align the political far-left and center-left around a perceived common enemy, the hardline American “peace through strength” view
d) can be used to attract Libertarians not so well informed to leftism since they will perceive some “common ground” with leftists
Simple research will bear out that the key founding figures in the intelligence communities of the US and UK, as well as most top leadership figures in US government agencies, all have resumes filled with ties to elite banking and its universities, foundations and organizations. While the rank and file may have other backgrounds, the leadership of government is largely of one pedigree, and it’s a rotten one that does not reflect any conservative values despite its pretensions.
Over the past few years, as I busied myself reading about how and why the far left was taking the nation in such a troubling direction, I came across history spanning the entire 20th century that the right has been silent on during my entire lifetime, and with good reason: once you peek behind the curtain of politics you begin to see who the puppetmaster is.
At least we saw something other than bills passed in a near-empty chamber, almost silently, in the middle of the night, though I’d much rather see something else entirely.
Until the last election cycle, all libertarians were interested in was legal dope, legal hookers, and legal sex at any age
THINGS I WISH I HAD SAID
True Liberty is not license. Those who think as you, sir, pervert liberty, and destroy the fundamental principles that allow a culture to thrive economically. This is the error of libertarian philosophy.
What libertarianism proposes is moral relativism under the pretense of “non-interference.” However, in the final measure, the result is that guaranteed outcome of any morally ambiguous system, which denies human nature and the transcendent truths that govern all cause and effect relationships. In practice the imagined utopia of the libertarian is identical in its altruistic deception to that of atheistic communism; and the outcome is predictable: the destruction of the individual and the corporate body of humanity we call society.
Libertarians think they may advance the cause of “social liberalism” simultaneously with “fiscal conservatism;” but this duality of purpose is folly, and works diametrically and insidiously against itself. The social plagues induced by such novel philosophies invariably drain the public treasury, render the distinctions of absolute right and wrong to ambiguity, destroy public confidence in justice, and dissolve private wealth.
Human society does not and cannot exist in a moral vacuum. A society that having no absolute standards of conduct defers all decisions to the individual, exercising little or no restraint on behavior, abdicates the single most legitimate purpose of the state: to increase the common good and uphold the moral order. To quote Edmond Burke:
“Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites, — in proportion as their love to justice is above their rapacity, — in proportion as their soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and presumption, — in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. Society cannot exist, unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”
-— Letter to a Member of the National Assembly (1791)
A corrupt society, filled with men of licentious inclinations, cannot maintain its economic stability; or do you suppose the folly of the Roman Republic is worth revisiting in our times? “Give us bread and circuses!”
Economics does not transcend moral absolutes. Economics does not trump the Natural Law. History proves conclusively that no immoral or amoral culture can long prosper, nor survive its growing litany of perversions against the Natural Law; for such a corrupt body becomes its own undoing. Unfettered liberty generates unfettered vice.
Vice is not virtue; even if for a time libertarianism may advance a nation’s economic standing, it remains a foundation of sand because it denies the absolute transcendent truth indelibly stamped on the consciousness of every man by He who created all things. God is not mocked.