To: highball
Whether they would have approved of it or not is completely irrelevant. They didn't put anything in the Constitution to prevent it. Do you know see how your one erroneous assumption is all that supports your other erroneous assumption? Of COURSE they put something into the constitution to prevent it!! You just don't accept the meaning they intended when they put it in there. I can't even give you a case of an obvious absurdity to get you to see how absurd is your theory!
611 posted on
03/09/2013 5:30:56 PM PST by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
To: DiogenesLamp
I can't even give you a case of an obvious absurdity to get you to see how absurd is your theory!
Sure you could, if your position had any basis in fact whatsoever. But birthers are often in the position of being unable to support their theories except by becoming increasingly strident in their groundless assertions.
We have too much work to do fighting the leftist agenda; don't waste your energy fighting reality.
652 posted on
03/09/2013 6:31:48 PM PST by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson