Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

It was never concretely defined. However, all the legal research done on the topic seems to contradict your interpretation.

The Court would never take your narrow view of the “natural born citizen” especially when there’s no contextual support.


494 posted on 03/09/2013 2:48:35 PM PST by HawkHogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]


To: HawkHogan
It was never concretely defined. However, all the legal research done on the topic seems to contradict your interpretation.

All the legal research of which you've heard. There is plenty of legal research that contradicts the common wisdom.

Here's a little piece for you to look at.

"Except the children of transient aliens"? How did that get in there? (I actually know how it got in there. :) )

Don't take my word for it, look it up yourself.

http://books.google.com/books?id=l3w4AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA51#v=onepage&q&f=false

568 posted on 03/09/2013 4:20:24 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson