Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

By your definition of NBC, a member of the British royal family could come to this country and father/give birth to a child, that child would then be eligible for the presidency and the royal thrown at the same time.

Do you really believe the FF were that stupid?


365 posted on 03/09/2013 12:00:38 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]


To: IMR 4350

That’s “throne”, but good point! LOL Bob


370 posted on 03/09/2013 12:05:19 PM PST by alstewartfan ("You looked like a still From Cecil B DeMille When I saw you Waiting at my door." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

To: IMR 4350

I don’t believe the Founders were stupid at all. They originally would have allowed naturalized citizens to run for President, and then increased the restriction to being born a US citizen. That is a low threshold, as is being 35 years old, but they actually believed the people should get to choose...

And here is a quote from the DISSENT in WKA (1898):

“Considering the circumstances surrounding the framing of the Constitution, I submit that it is unreasonable to conclude that “natural-born citizen” applied to everybody born within the geographical tract known as the United States, irrespective of circumstances, and that the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country, whether of royal parentage or not, or whether of the Mongolian, Malay or other race, were eligible to the Presidency, while children of our citizens, born abroad, were not.”


373 posted on 03/09/2013 12:06:57 PM PST by Mr Rogers (America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson