Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
Both of the Chief Election Officials (Secretaries of State) in Arizona and Kansas used the letters from the Hawaii Registrar to approve Obama for the ballot in those states.

Not so. The SOS approved the ballot without reading the letter of verification, and the Kansas ballot already had Obama on it prior to the letter of verification.

Since Governor Romney won the electors in those states, the issue is moot.

There's nothing moot about having a Constitutionally ineligible candidate on any ballot.

We’ll have to continue to wait and see whether the Hawaii Letter of Verification complies with FRE or not when Judge Wingate rules in Mississippi.

What happened to your "moot" argument since Romney won Mississippi?? Whatever ruling finally gets made won't be made on the basis of the letter of verification, especially when there are so many procedural grounds available.

1,224 posted on 03/11/2013 9:47:44 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1221 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

What is moot is the remedy of removing a candidate’s name from a state ballot for being illegal in an election that the allegedly illegal candidate lost anyway.
The Mississippi lawsuit was morphed by Orly Taitz from a primary election ballot challenge into a federal civil RICO action.
You are correct, the federal judge in Mississippi has the Letter of Verification to take under advisement only as an exhibit to accompany a copy of the whitehouse.gov image of the Long Form in a reply to a Motion for Sanctions, nothing more.


1,226 posted on 03/11/2013 10:59:52 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson