Obama claims he was born in Hawaii. He has his documents and newspaper articles. People (including judges) will be inclined to assume that Obama is correct. It's just not a bizarre claim for someone to claim he was born in Hawaii. If you really want to prove he was born somewhere else, you really need some significant evidence to support the claim. It's not enough to criticize the way Hawaii keeps records or to state that the newspaper articles might have been written even if he had been born in Kenya. You might just as well spend the first day questioning that the judge is really the judge.
This whole birther thing seems to be a train wreck. You better hope no judge grants a trial.
Obama’s “documents” and newspaper articles are all recent frauds, but then you knew that and love them all the more.
There is zero evidence of any Hawaiian birth. He never even saw Hawaii until immigrating from Indonesia.
Okay, you've confused me. He originally claimed to be Kenyan and then claimed to born in Hawaii and it's all good with you? He's whatever he says he is?
Sure, of course a judge would agree to that. If s/he didn't think that was okie dokie I'd know there was something wrong.
I was naive once, but not that naive. Onward through the fog, dude.