The existence of a database entry is very significant. In addition to the other disinformation and inconsistencies in the Obama biography it reinforces a pattern of dishonesty and deceit in everything Obama and his supporters say. The Obama biography presented by the MSM is one lie after another. The true facts are difficult to come by. We have a duty as patriotic citizens to seek out the truth and to tell the truth.
If you have proof that the data base is fraudulent please post it along with the links.
That's not the way it works. If somebody presents something as "evidence" they have to have some documentation to back it up, some explanation of where it came from, something to vouch for its authenticity.
If you assume that -- barring other evidence -- some Obama short-form or long-form birth certificate is fraudulent, you have to apply the same standard here and ask for supporting evidence or documentation before assuming that something that arrives out of the blue is valid and authentic.
The case of all these supposed social security numbers is similar. If you somebody tells you that Obama has 25 social security numbers are you going to take their word for it, without further examination? I notice an awful lot of results for "Acxiom database hacked" when I do the search.
Here's the thing: why is a 30 year old name-address combination marked "Date Reported: 02/2010"? Do you really need anything else to call the whole story into question?