IMHO...
Now tie in a) Morgan, Rockefeller (and all their related interests) in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, b) how European international banking was extending its influence and power in America while making large profits all throughout the 19th century, and c) how Morgan was simply a European banking representative, and the picture will be complete.
Socialism is backed by globalist money interests. European politics since WWII prove the point. Nationalism is painted as bad, subservience to central banking is painted as good, Christianity and the Bible are painted as bad, media and education are controlled by the banking establishment and its foundation system and endowments and boards of universities - and a big, fat socialist government sits over every nation. The idea is... keep the “little people” out of owning things (without debt) and operating businesses. Entice the little people to stay in debt their entire lives, both personally and via government spending and borrowing. Control the capital markets so small business needs to go to the establishment for financing; disallow “little people” from investing directly in each other’s businesses. This keeps most small businesses small, and only a few will grow enough to become competitive with the big boys. And those that do will simply become part of the establishment, needing them when they require large financing or want to sell their business, i.e., “go public”.
Fabianism is tied in completely with the elite wealthy interests of the world - there is a distinct pattern to the financial fingers reaching out into the “developing world”, bringing monopolistic control and huge profits back to the elites.
IMHO, an in-depth study of Cecil Rhodes would be essential to understanding Fabianism.
In the end, Nationalism really is bad. Nationalism is another form of socialism.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2919329/posts
What’s good is what the Founders gave us. That wasn’t Nationalism. In reading the Constitution, it’s fairly easy to see that it protects us from nationalism. It fosters state and local. The 10th amendment, specifically, is the anti-nationalist amendment.
Thank you for your post, it does put into context just how large the interests are that are out to take our liberty from us.