[EternalVigilance]

You’re never going to convince anyone to a position you will not assert, AND stand for consistently in your political and policy actions.

That’s the primary practical problem with the incrementalist, compromised approach that has been taken for forty years. It has no moral, constitutional, legal, or political authority, because right up front it abandons the only moral, constitutional, legal, and political argument against the practice of human abortion, which is equal protection for the unalienable rights of all, starting with the supreme right, the right to live.

[Notary Sojac]

There are lots of well-read people on FR who loathe abortion, yet reluctantly conclude that today, as it stands, the Constitution fails to explicitly prohibit it.

I'm one of them (at least I think I'm well read) and in who knows how many posts, you have completely failed to convince me of your position. Or convinced very many others, by the general appearance of these threads.

Good luck to you, and perhaps by 2032 or so you'll be able to get more votes than Jill Stein or Roseanne Barr.

Lotta babies gonna get cut up while we wait for the Hoefling administration to issue its first EO, though.