To: Uncle Chip
this is the law needs to be considered: 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the others imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or (2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013. History.s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1188, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 2005-27. ===law==== Heller is meaningless if a fundamental individual right is acknowledge but sleazy legislators prohibit exercise of the fundamental individual right. (ie cars legal but use of roads is illegal) Also lets not forget the JURY INSTRUCTIONS. opening and closing statements ARE NOT WHERE TRIALS ARE WON/LOST. trials are won on pretial motions and selection of jury instructions.
15 posted on
02/24/2013 7:02:11 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: All
this is the law needs to be considered: 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the others imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or (2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013. History.s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1188, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 2005-27. ===law==== Heller is meaningless if a fundamental individual right is acknowledge but sleazy legislators prohibit exercise of the fundamental individual right. (ie cars legal but use of roads is illegal) Also lets not forget the JURY INSTRUCTIONS. opening and closing statements ARE NOT WHERE TRIALS ARE WON/LOST. trials are won on pretial motions and selection of jury instructions.
16 posted on
02/24/2013 7:04:25 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
(sorry about the repost, the paragraphs was not working)
this is the law needs to be considered:
776.012 Use of force in defense of person.A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the others imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013. History.s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1188, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 2005-27.
===law====
Heller is meaningless if a fundamental individual right is acknowledge but sleazy legislators prohibit exercise of the fundamental individual right. (ie cars legal but use of roads is illegal)
Also lets not forget the JURY INSTRUCTIONS. opening and closing statements ARE NOT WHERE TRIALS ARE WON/LOST. trials are won on pretial motions and selection of jury instructions.
17 posted on
02/24/2013 7:07:57 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson